Many San Jose congregations have gone fully contemporary, with LED lights and live-band arrangements, while a shrinking number of churches still anchor Sunday mornings in traditional hymnody. Local traditionalists argue the old hymns carry richer doctrine; contemporary advocates say relevance keeps young tech-generation families in the pews.
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentmy grandma used to play piano every sunday at a little Assembly of God church off Alum Rock Ave, been closed now maybe 20 years. she knew every hymn by heart. never used a chord chart, just played from memory and from love i guess. i dont think God was less present in that room than He is in these big production churches. i also dont think He was more present. i just miss her and i miss that room and maybe thats all this really is for a lot of us older folks if were being honest
went to three different megachurches in the south bay this year trying to find a church home after my divorce. all three had incredible production value. fog machines. perfect sound mixing. pastors with nice sneakers. i could not tell you a single thing any of them preached about. not one. i now drive to a small Presbyterian church in Los Gatos every Sunday and it takes me 45 minutes each way. the pastor uses a manuscript. we sing from a hymnal. i actually remember what i learned. make of that what you will.
Born and raised in San Jose, attended Valley Christian and then Calvary Church for decades. I'll say this plainly: when you swap 'A Mighty Fortress Is Our God' for seven-minute loop-pedal noodling with four words repeated forty times, you have not upgraded worship. You have downgraded theology. Luther packed more doctrine into one hymn than most contemporary sets do in an entire year. This isn't nostalgia talking. It's catechesis.
I moved here from Dallas two years ago for a job at one of the semiconductor firms downtown and I genuinely could not find a church for six months because every single congregation I visited felt like a Hillsong satellite with better parking. I eventually found a small Reformed congregation meeting in a rented space near Willow Glen. Twenty people. Real preaching. Actual creeds. I cried the first Sunday because I hadn't heard the Apostles' Creed sung corporately in two years. There is a hunger for depth out here. The market just isn't meeting it.
To everyone defending contemporary worship because it "reaches young people" — I'm 26, I grew up in a contemporary church in Cupertino, I left at 22 because I had genuine theological questions and nobody around me had the vocabulary to even engage them. Came back at 25 after finding a church that actually taught me what justification means, what the covenants are, what I actually believe and WHY. Young people don't just want entertainment. Some of us desperately want substance. Someone please tell the South Bay church planting world this.
Hard disagree with the whole framing of this debate. The loop pedal isn't the enemy. Shallow lyrics are the enemy. Keith Getty writes contemporary-ish hymns with more theology per line than half the 1800s stuff we're supposedly protecting. Can we please stop equating "old" with "deep" and "new" with "shallow"? That's lazy thinking dressed up as discernment.
The tech industry families argument cuts both ways. I work at a company in north San Jose and half my colleagues who grew up Christian left the church entirely — not because it was too traditional, but because it felt intellectually vacuous. Contemporary worship that prioritizes emotion over substance did NOT retain them. It just made the exit ramp smoother. Depth keeps people. Spectacle loses them eventually.
I want to push back on something specifically for the San Jose context. A lot of our congregations serve first and second generation immigrant families — Vietnamese, Filipino, Korean, Chinese communities especially in East San Jose and Milpitas. Many of those communities have incredibly robust hymnody in their OWN languages and traditions. The debate as framed assumes a very white, very Anglo baseline for what counts as "traditional." That framing is itself a theological problem worth examining.
Genuine question for the traditionalists in this thread: have any of you actually tried explaining to a 19-year-old what a hymnal even is? I volunteer with youth at our church near Santana Row and I promise you the battle we're fighting is not "hymns vs. loop pedals." It's "church vs. nothing." Meet kids where they are first, earn the right to go deeper second. That's just basic discipleship strategy.
Fun fact that nobody seems to know: the hymns everyone calls "traditional" were largely considered dangerous, emotionally manipulative crowd-pleasers when they were first introduced in the 18th and 19th centuries. Charles Wesley was basically the Hillsong of his day. Look it up. Every generation thinks the previous generation's innovations are sacred and their own generation's innovations are compromise. It's almost like this argument is completely cyclical and has been going on forever.
ok but can we talk about how some of these "traditional" churches in south bay are just playing slightly slower contemporary songs and calling themselves liturgical lol. i visited one on Blossom Hill last spring and the hymnal hadnt been touched in probably fifteen years. the cover was literally warped. so whos really keeping the tradition alive here
I actually think this debate misses the real problem in San Jose specifically. We have enormous socioeconomic inequality here — families commuting ninety minutes because they cant afford rent, working two jobs, exhausted on Sunday morning. Whether you have a loop pedal or an organ, if your church isnt addressing the actual lived reality of people in this city, the worship style is irrelevant. Depth without application is just aesthetics with a Bible verse attached.
The funniest part of this whole conversation is that the churches with the biggest LED rigs and the most elaborate loop setups in San Jose are also usually the ones with the biggest budgets for actual theological education, seminary-trained pastors, and small group curriculum. Meanwhile some of the scrappiest hymnal-only congregations I've visited locally have pastors who haven't cracked a commentary since 1987. Production value and theological depth are simply not correlated. Stop pretending they are.
Nope. Hard disagree. Contemporary worship done well is every bit as theologically rigorous. Come visit us some Sunday before you write off the whole movement.
Should Christians pray to saints — or is asking Mary and the dead for help straight-up idolatry?
56 comments
Did Christianity give birth to modern science — or did the church spend centuries trying to strangle it in the cradle?
56 comments
Does God choose who gets saved, or do you choose God — and is Calvinism secretly making God into a monster?
55 comments
Do humans have an immortal soul — or did the church steal that idea from Plato and dress it up as Scripture?
55 comments