Some of the oldest church buildings in Delaware sit in Wilmington neighborhoods facing shrinking and aging congregations. Traditionalists say the hymnody IS the witness; pragmatists say an empty sanctuary saves no one.
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentContemporary worship "to survive" is not survival, it's identity suicide. Show me ONE example of a historic mainline congregation that gutted its liturgy for contemporary worship and came out the other side with a STRONGER theological identity. I'll wait. What usually happens is you get a generic product that competes with every megachurch within a 30-mile radius and loses, because why would someone drive to an old building in Brandywine to hear the same Hillsong playlist they can stream at home?
Born and raised in Wilmington, baptized at Old Swedes Church, and I will die on this hill: you do not swap out a Watts hymn for a fog machine and a praise band just because your pews are half empty. The hymnody IS the theology. When we sing 'O God, Our Help in Ages Past' we are confessing something dense and rich about time, providence, and the nature of God. You cannot compress that into a four-chord chorus repeated eleven times. Empty pews are a pastoral problem, not a liturgical one. Fix your community engagement, fix your preaching, fix your parking situation — don't gut the worship that's been forming souls in this city since before there WAS a Delaware.
My grandmother played organ at a Wilmington Presbyterian church for 41 years. Forty-one years. She knew every hymn in the 1955 hymnal by heart and could transpose on the fly. When they finally brought in a worship team around 2009 she didn't complain once, just quietly stepped back. That always convicted me. Maybe the question isn't which style God prefers but whether we're humble enough to serve people we don't fully understand.
Fun fact for everyone confidently defending "18th century hymnody" — most of the hymns people think of as ancient traditional worship were actually considered shockingly contemporary and emotional innovations when they were introduced. Isaac Watts was the hillsong of his day. People literally walked out of services protesting his paraphrases. So the idea that there's some pure unchanging liturgical tradition we're protecting is historically illiterate. Every generation has had this same argument.
The premise of this debate is flawed and I wish people would stop presenting it as an either/or. My congregation — won't say which one, but it's been standing since the 1790s — does both. We kept the Doxology, we kept the Apostles' Creed spoken in unison, we kept communion monthly with the traditional words of institution. We ALSO added a contemporary service at 9 AM. Attendance is up 22% over three years. The ancient and the new are not enemies. Stop letting Twitter theology convince you they are.
I'll tell you what saves nobody: a congregation so proud of its heritage it can't be bothered to know the names of the families living within two blocks of its front door. I've driven past some of these beautiful old Wilmington churches on a Sunday morning and the parking lot is empty by 11:15 and locked up tight by noon, sitting silent in neighborhoods that are hurting and hungry and looking for something. The hymns aren't the witness. The people are. And if the people aren't there, it doesn't matter what's in the bulletin.
okay but has anyone actually been inside some of these buildings on a sunday recently? i visited one on market street last spring and there were literally eleven people there, average age probably 74. i'm not being mean, i love those folks, but eleven people singing a processional hymn in a building that seats 300 is not a witness to anything except decline. at some point faithfulness has to include asking whether you're actually reaching anyone.
Any Wilmington folks here actually attending these older congregations who want to weigh in instead of theorizing? Because I feel like half this thread is people who haven't set foot in one of these churches in years telling them what to do. If you care so much, show up on a Sunday. Volunteer. Bring someone. The critique is easy. Discipleship is harder.
Someone up there said Watts was controversial when introduced and that's not really accurate — his hymns gained widespread acceptance quite quickly in dissenting congregations and the real controversy was more about replacing ONLY Scripture-based psalmody, which is a much more specific theological dispute than just "people didn't like new music." The broader point about change being constant has some merit but let's not rewrite history to score debate points.
just moved here from Atlanta six months ago for work and honestly Wilmington's older churches are one of the things that surprised me most about this city in a GOOD way. the architecture, the graveyards, the sense that people have been worshiping in these spots for centuries — that moved me more than i expected. i'd hate to see those communities chase relevance and lose what actually makes them distinct. fwiw
Should Christians pray to saints — or is asking Mary and the dead for help straight-up idolatry?
56 comments
Did Christianity give birth to modern science — or did the church spend centuries trying to strangle it in the cradle?
56 comments
Do humans have an immortal soul — or did the church steal that idea from Plato and dress it up as Scripture?
55 comments
Does God choose who gets saved, or do you choose God — and is Calvinism secretly making God into a monster?
55 comments